Memorandum Opinion and Order
Before the Court are the United States’ Petitions to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Administration Summons [Docket 1].1 For the reasons set forth below, the Petitions are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
You are here
Opinions
The Southern District of West Virginia offers a database of opinions starting in the year 2001, listed by year and judge. For a more detailed search, enter the keyword or case number in the search to the right or sort using the drop-downs below.
5:09-mc-00043
Author:
Thomas E. Johnston
6:01-cr-00256
Memorandum Opinion and Order
On June 4, 2009, the Government filed a Petition for Revocation of Supervised Release as to Dana Michael Ide, contending that Ide had failed to the submit monthly reports required by the conditions of his supervised release [Docket 196]. On July 17, 2009, Ide filed a Motion to Dismiss the Government’s Petition [Docket 207], and the Government filed a Response on July 28, 2009 [Docket 209]. The question presented by these filings is whether 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e) automatically tolled Ide’s term of federal supervised release for the period that he was in state confinement prior to his state-court conviction, and thus, whether Ide was under supervised release when the Government filed the Petition.
Author:
Joseph R. Goodwin
5:09-cv-00152
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Before the Court is Defendants Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc. and CIT Bank’s Motion to Dismiss Count I of the Complaint [Docket 7]. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is DENIED. Also pending is Defendants’ Motion to Accept Filing of Reply Brief [Docket 13]. This unopposed motion is GRANTED.
Author:
Thomas E. Johnston
2:09-cv-00349
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Pending is defendant Clyde Blair’s motion to dismiss, filed April 27, 2009.
Author:
John T. Copenhaver, Jr.
2:08-cr-00283
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Pending is defendant Antonio Collins’ motion to suppress evidence, filed March 30, 2009. The findings of fact that follow are made by a preponderance of the evidence received at the hearing on April 20, 2009.
Author:
John T. Copenhaver, Jr.
2:08-cv-00976
Memorandum Opinion
This is an action seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Claimant’s applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”), under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433, 1381-1383f. Both parties have consented in writing to a decision by the United States Magistrate Judge.
Author:
Mary E. Stanley
2:09-cv-00342
Order
Pending before the court is Defendant Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. of America’s (“Travelers”) Motion to Dismiss Courts III and IV of Plaintiff Southern West Virginia Paving, Inc.’s (“SWVP”) Complaint [Docket 6]. For the reasons stated herein, the Motion is GRANTED.
Author:
Joseph R. Goodwin
5:08-cr-00269
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Indictment [Docket 24]. By Order entered February 25, 2009, this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort for submission of proposed findings and a recommendation (PF&R). Magistrate Judge VanDervort filed his PF&R on April 17, 2009 [Docket 31]. In that filing, the magistrate judge recommended that this Court deny Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment. Objections to Magistrate Judge VanDervort’s PF&R were due by May 4, 2009, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff timely filed objections on April 30, 2009.
Author:
Thomas E. Johnston
5:09-cv-00011
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Quash Insufficient Service of Process [Docket 4]. Plaintiff filed the instant complaint in the Circuit Court of Raleigh County, West Virginia, on November 14, 2008, alleging breach of contract and violations of the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act. Defendant filed its Notice of Removal [Docket 1] in this Court on January 7, 2009, and filed its Motion to Quash Insufficient Service of Process [Docket 4] on February 12, 2009. To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the motion. Thus, the matter is now ripe for the Court’s consideration.
Author:
Thomas E. Johnston
5:08-cv-00885
Amended Memorandum Opinion and Remand Order1
Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand [Docket 6] and Defendant’s Motion to Extend Time to Respond [Docket 8]. This case was originally filed in the Circuit Court of Greenbrier County, West Virginia, on May 22, 2008. Defendant removed the case to this Court on July 1, 2008, on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiffs now allege that the amount-incontroversy requirement has not been met and seek a remand of the case back to the Circuit Court of Greenbrier County.
Author:
Thomas E. Johnston