You are here

Opinions

The Southern District of West Virginia offers a database of opinions starting in the year 2001, listed by year and judge. For a more detailed search, enter the keyword or case number in the search to the right or sort using the drop-downs below.

3:11-cv-00149

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Currently pending are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Complaint (ECF No. 46) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Protective Order (ECF No. 77).  For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Complaint and DENIES as moot Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Protective Order.

Author:
Robert C. Chambers
2:11-cv-00342

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Pending before the court are the plaintiff Logan & Kanawha Coal Co., LLC’s (“Logan”) Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award [Docket 1] and the defendant Detherage Coal Sales, LLC’s (“Detherage”) Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award [Docket 9].  For the reasons discussed below, the court DENIES the plaintiff’s Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award [Docket 1] and GRANTS the defendant’s Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award [Docket 9].

Author:
Joseph R. Goodwin
2:11-cv-00989

Memorandum Opinion and Order

The Jefferson County Commission and two of its commissioners, Patricia Noland and Dale Manuel, both of whom reside in Jefferson County, West Virginia, and each proceeding in his or her individual capacity, filed this suit on November 4, 2011, challenging the congressional apportionment enacted by the State of West Virginia following the 2010 census. In their Complaint, the plaintiffs name as defendants Secretary of State Natalie E. Tennant, Governor Earl Ray Tomblin, State Senate President Jeffrey Kessler, and Speaker Richard Thompson of the West Virginia House of Delegates, each in his or her official capacity. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2284, this three-judge district court was duly appointed by the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to consider the plaintiffs' claims. The trial of the matter took place at The Robert C. Byrd United States Courthouse in Charleston on December 28, 2011, and it is now ripe for decision.

Author:
Irene C. Berger
2:11-cv-00636

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Pending before the court are the plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [Docket 6] and the defendants’ Motion to File Surreply in Response to Plaintiff’s Reply Brief on Motion for Remand [Docket 14].  For the reasons discussed below, the plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is GRANTED and the defendants’ Motion to File Surreply is GRANTED.

Author:
Joseph R. Goodwin
2:11-cv-00396

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Pending before the court is the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration [Docket 15].  For the reasons discussed below, this motion is DENIED.

Author:
Joseph R. Goodwin
2:11-cv-00533

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Pending before the court is the plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [Docket 6].  For the reasons discussed below, this Motion is DENIED.

Author:
Joseph R. Goodwin
3:10-cv-01039

Memorandum Opinion

This action seeks a review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (hereinafter “Commissioner”) denying Claimant’s applications for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433, 1381-1383f. This case is presently before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for judgment on the pleadings as articulated in their briefs. (Docket Nos. 14 and 17).  Both parties have consented in writing to a decision by the United States Magistrate Judge. (Docket Nos. 15 and 16).

Author:
Cheryl A. Eifert
MDL 1968

Pretrial Order #87
(Memorandum Opinion and Order re Dispositive and Daubert Motions)

Pending are the (1) Actavis defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket 523], their Motion to Exclude Plaintiffs’ General Liability Experts [Docket 525], their Motion to Exclude Unreliable Hearsay [Docket 527], their Motion to Strike the Affidavit of Lynne Farrell [Docket 572], their Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 620, which is the declaration of David M. Bliesner, Ph.D. [Docket 579], and the Mylan defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and to Exclude Expert Testimony [Docket 528], all of which are filed in 2:08-md-1968; (2) the defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment and to Strike Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 621, which is the declaration of Reynolds Delgado III, M.D., both of which are filed in the Vega case [Docket 55 and 68 in 2:09-cv-00768], and (3) the defendants’ Motions to Exclude the Decedent’s Postmortem Blood Digoxin Concentration and the Expert Testimony of Richard Mason, M.D., and Keith Gibson, and for Summary Judgment [Docket 120], their Motion to Strike the Affidavit of Lynne Farrell [Docket 144], and their additional request to Strike Plaintiffs’ Exhibit 620, the declaration of Dr. Bliesner [Docket145], all of which are filed in the McCornack action, 2:09-cv-00671.

Author:
Joseph R. Goodwin
2:10-cv-01295

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Pending is the motion of Bank of America, N.A. (“BOA”), for judgment on the pleadings filed April 4, 2011.

Author:
John T. Copenhaver, Jr.
3:11-cr-00058

Memorandum Opinion and Order

On October 10, 2011, this Court held a hearing to sentence Defendant in the above-captioned case.  At the sentencing, Defendant’s counsel raised two objections to the presentence report.  As ordered at the October 10 hearing and for the reasons given in this memorandum opinion, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s first objection and DENIES Defendant’s second objection to the presentence report.

Author:
Robert C. Chambers

Pages